# Functional Analysis (FAR Analysis)

In transfer pricing, FAR Analysis is the backbone of comparability. It evaluates the _Functions performed_, _Assets used_, and _Risks assumed_ by each entity in a multinational enterprise (MNE) group. This breakdown helps determine the arm’s length nature of intercompany transactions.

Let’s break this down into clear, practical insights with frequently asked questions.

## Key Takeaways

- FAR Analysis ensures that profits are aligned with the value creation of each group entity.
- It’s mandatory for determining appropriate transfer pricing methods and [Profit Level Indicators (PLIs)](/content/transfer-pricing-glossary/what-are-profit-level-indicators-plis/index.html).
- Functions, assets, and risks must be carefully documented and consistently reflected across all TP reports.

## What is Included in a FAR Analysis?

A comprehensive FAR Analysis consists of three elements:

### Functions Performed

Functions are the day-to-day activities an entity carries out. Examples include:

- **Manufacturing** (e.g., assembling or producing goods)
- **Procurement** (e.g., sourcing materials)
- **Marketing and Sales** (e.g., advertising and distribution)
- **R&D and IP Management** (e.g., developing and owning patents)

Each function must be mapped to its contribution to the value chain. The more critical or unique the function, the more likely it is to command a higher share of the profit.

### Assets Used

Assets can be:

- **Tangible**: machinery, equipment, buildings
- **Intangible**: patents, trademarks, proprietary software, customer lists

Ownership of key assets, especially intangibles, often signals greater value creation and thus justifies a larger portion of profits.

### Risks Assumed

Risks influence how rewards and losses are allocated. Key categories include:

- **Market Risk** (e.g., customer demand volatility)
- **Inventory Risk** (e.g., spoilage or obsolescence)
- **Credit Risk** (e.g., non-payment by customers)
- **Operational Risk** (e.g., system failures)

Entities that bear greater risks generally expect higher returns.

## Why is FAR Analysis Important in Transfer Pricing?

It underpins the choice of transfer pricing method. For example:

- **Resale Price Method (RPM)** is suitable for distributors with limited functions and risks.
- [**Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM)**](/content/transfer-pricing-glossary/transactional-net-margin-method-tnmm/index.html) is common for low-risk service providers or manufacturers.
- [**Profit Split Method (PSM)**](/content/transfer-pricing-glossary/profit-split-method-psm/index.html) may apply when both parties contribute unique intangibles or bear significant risks.

**Without a proper FAR analysis, it’s impossible to assess whether a transaction is arm’s length.**

## How is FAR Analysis Documented?

Typically, FAR analysis is structured in a matrix form, comparing each related party in terms of:

- Functions (F)
- Assets (A)
- Risks (R)

This allows tax authorities to see who does what, who owns what, and who takes on what risks—ensuring transparency and compliance.

## How is a FAR Analysis Conducted in Practice?

Here's a step-by-step guide:

1. **Interview Key Personnel**: Understand operations, responsibilities, and strategic objectives.
2. **Review Contracts and Agreements**: Especially intercompany agreements, service contracts, IP licenses.
3. **Analyze Financial Statements**: Identify cost structures, asset ownership, and profit margins.
4. **Evaluate Organizational Structure**: Including legal ownership versus operational control.
5. **Compare With External Data**: Benchmark similar companies to support your positions.

## What Role Does FAR Play in Choosing a Profit Level Indicator (PLI)?

Each PLI aligns with a certain risk and function profile:

- **Operating Margin**: Often used for limited-risk distributors (TNMM)
- **Berry Ratio**: Suitable for service providers with limited cost of goods sold
- **Cost Plus Mark-Up**: Appropriate for contract manufacturers or routine service entities

FAR Analysis directly informs which PLI is most reliable and defensible.

## Is FAR Analysis Only for Multinational Groups?

Primarily, yes. But the principles of FAR are also relevant in:

- **Joint Ventures**
- **Cost Sharing Arrangements**
- **Intercompany Services**

Anywhere related parties engage in cross-border dealings, FAR is crucial.

## What are Common Pitfalls in FAR Analysis?

1. **Over-generalization**: Describing all entities with similar language dilutes clarity.
2. **Ignoring Actual Conduct**: Tax authorities place weight on actual behavior over contractual terms.
3. **Outdated Information**: Business models evolve—so must the FAR analysis.
4. **Inconsistent Narrative**: Descriptions in the FAR should match financial outcomes and chosen methods.

## How Often Should a FAR Analysis Be Updated?

At least **annually**—especially if:

- There are material changes in business operations
- New functions are introduced
- Risk profiles shift (e.g., due to market entry or exit)

Stale FAR analyses are a red flag during audits.

## Why FAR Analysis Matters

A functional analysis isn’t just a checkbox. It’s the anchor of every solid transfer pricing policy. It:

- Justifies profit allocation
- Supports method selection
- Helps avoid disputes with tax authorities

## Transform your approach to transfer pricing

[Book a Demo](/content/book-a-demo/index.html)